GameDriver
Quality-as-a-Service

We run the test plan. You ship the game.

QaaS means GameDriver runs the test plan for your studio's games. One engagement covers the portfolio, and we support each title where it is: planning, development, live or sustainment. Our QA leads write and run the tests, AI-assisted maintenance proposes fixes as the game changes and our team reviews them, and findings arrive in your team's tools every build. Your QA team gets back to what only product knowledge can do: exploration, design feedback, and the release calls that decide what ships.

You deliver the game. We measure its quality.

QaaS Delivery Model

Where QaaS fits with your team.

Two halves of a quality function. QaaS handles repetitive validation at scale. Your team handles judgment, expertise, and the calls only they can make.

QaaS handles
The machine work
Continuous, scaled, automated – runs against every build on real hardware.
  • 🔁
    Repetitive build-over-build validation
    The same tests, every build, every platform – without consuming engineer time.
  • 📐
    Coverage maintenance as content evolves
    AI flags tests that drift as the game changes and proposes fixes, reviewed before they merge.
  • 🔍
    Triage and de-noising of findings
    Separates real regressions from stale-path noise before they reach your team.
  • 📊
    Continuous regression signal
    A consistent read on quality across every build, not milestone-gated.
Your team handles
The judgment work
Expertise, design decisions, and ship calls – the work that benefits from product knowledge.
  • 🧠
    Domain expertise and exploratory work
    Investigating the unexpected, finding emergent issues, applying product instinct.
  • 🎯
    Defining what “passing” means
    Setting the quality bar for your specific game – what's acceptable, what isn't.
  • ⚖️
    Release calls and player-facing judgment
    Trade-offs between scope, schedule, and quality that only your team can weigh.
  • 🚀
    What ships, when, and to whom
    The strategic decisions – release windows, audience targeting, rollout strategy.
Combined output
✨
The result
Release confidence – with engineers focused on what only they can do.
Continuous coverage at scale, plus human judgment where it matters. The two halves of a quality function, doing what each does best.
100%
Of the work, by the right doer

Every project is different. Every test plan is too.

Talk to a QA lead
From a recent RFP

Same RFP scope. Smaller team. More depth per role.

One example, sized from a real RFP for an AAA multi-platform release, with both bids covering the same test scope. Customer and proprietary details are withheld, and the staffing math is shown as bid. Your numbers will depend on your game, your platforms and your test plan.

Traditional model
Labor-based outsource
Headcount scales linearly with coverage. Most of the team is repetitive execution work.
47
people · 6 roles
Senior Director of Test1
Senior Test Managers3
Test Leads2
Software Test Engineers2
Testers7
Test Associates32
Test associates68% of team
Distinct roles6
Cost shapeHeadcount-bound
QaaS model
Continuous, automated execution
Repetitive work moves to a managed execution layer. Your team keeps the judgment work.
13
people · 9 roles
Your QA team
Senior Director of Test1
Senior Test Manager1
Test Manager1
Test Lead1
Senior Test Engineers2
Test Associates4
GameDriver QaaS
GameDriver Platform1
Delivery Manager1
AI Engineer1
Replaces
Repetitive build-over-build validation across every platform – continuously.
Your team10 people
GameDriver3 people
Cost shapeSubscription
⚡
Same RFP scope, smaller team, more depth per role. Repetitive execution moves to automation, and your experienced people focus on the judgment work that benefits from product knowledge.
47
Legacy headcount
13
QaaS headcount

Buy hours. Or buy coverage.

Traditional outsourced QA
Pricing model
Hourly seats
Scope
Per project, per hour
Who absorbs scope and change risk
You
What you're buying
Hours of labor
Who's doing the work
Hourly testers; pool composition varies by vendor
Keeping scripted coverage current as the game evolves
Manually re-tested, billed hourly
Dev console execution
Rare, varies by vendor
Availability
Capacity depends on staffing and scheduling
Burst capacity for new features and content drops
Extend the contract, re-onboard new testers
Time to first signal
Weeks of ramp-up; repeats each cycle
Accountability
Hours billed regardless of outcome
GameDriver Horizon
Pricing model
Studio-wide license
Scope
Every title in the studio
Who absorbs scope and change risk
Shared
What you're buying
A platform, with our engineers behind it
Who's doing the work
Your in-house QA team
Keeping scripted coverage current as the game evolves
AI-assisted maintenance, reviewed by your team
Dev console execution
Available – bring your own dev kits
Availability
Your team's schedule
Burst capacity for new features and content drops
Finite team stretched across more scope
Time to first signal
Limited by your team's velocity
Accountability
Your team owns the results, we own the platform
GameDriver QaaS
Pricing model
Flat subscription
Scope
Whole portfolio under one plan
Who absorbs scope and change risk
We do
What you're buying
A managed quality service
Who's doing the work
Senior QA leads – recognizable names in the industry
Keeping scripted coverage current as the game evolves
AI-assisted maintenance, reviewed by our QA leads; included
Dev console execution
Yes (PlayStation, Nintendo via cert)
Availability
Automated execution continues across every scheduled build, including nights and weekends
Burst capacity for new features and content drops
Elasticity built in – burst risk is on us
Time to first signal
First signal in weeks. Trends follow immediately.
Accountability
Service-level accountability

Outsourced QA is sold by the hour, so every change to the game is billed to you. Horizon licenses the platform to the whole studio and backs your team with ours. QaaS delivers it as a service, and the risk that the game keeps changing sits with us.

QA Solved. Not Staffed.

Tell us how your team works today.

Tell us how your team tests today and where results arrive too late. We'll tell you whether Horizon or QaaS fits, and what each would change.